Analisis Kinerja Dosen berdasar Penilaian Mahasiswa dalam Perspektif Gender
(Lecturer Performance Analysis based on Student Assessment from a Gender Perspective)
Abstrak
Many studies have been conducted regarding the quality of education. Assessment of the quality of education from the educator's side is generally carried out using a questionnaire given to students or Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET). It can also be called Lecturer Evaluation by Students (EDOM) at the end of the lecture before the final semester exam. In various countries, EDOM is used not only to assess lecturers' quality but also for promotions. Although the reliability of EDOM as an important factor in assessing lecturer performance is still widely debated, the facts prove that EDOM is still used. Furthermore, lecturer performance can also be assessed based on the lecturer's ability to conduct research and the existence of gender bias at EDOM. It is important to link the assessment of lecturers from the three fields of education and teaching, research, and community service, considering that DIKTI itself always selects outstanding lecturers who are also assessed in these three fields every year. Therefore, this research aims to provide empirical evidence on the reliability of lecturer evaluations by students to assess lecturer performance and its relationship to the field of research and community service. Research will be conducted on all lecturers and teaching assistants, with students as respondents who fill out the assessment. Hypothesis testing was carried out using n-way ANOVA, and the data was analyzed using quantitative descriptive methods. The research results using the Anova test prove that student evaluations of lecturers cannot be differentiated based on student gender, lecturer gender, lecturer's ability to conduct research, published scientific papers, and the number of lecturers who provide community service. Based on quantitative descriptive analysis, outstanding lecturers can be proposed for the academic year.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Referensi
Bierstaker, J. L., Howe, M., & Seol, I. (2004). Accounting majors’ perceptions regarding the 150-hour rule. Issues in Accounting Education (Gale Academic Online), 19(2), 211+. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=anon~ffaf4afb&id=GALE%7CA118793256&v=2.1&it=r&sid=googleScholar&asid=d5d50147
Boring, A. (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.006
Cahyadi, D. D., Andayani, S., & Suryaningrum, D. H. (2019). Accounting Students Perceptions on Factors Affecting Career Choices. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 2(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.33005/jasf.v2i2.63
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business Research Methods : Twelfth Edition. Mc Graw Hill.
Ferdinand, A. (2014). Metode Penelitian Manajemen. UNDIP Press: Semarang.
Fitch, K. (2013). Public Relations Student Perceptions of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 10, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.5840/jbee2013107
Fitri, S. F. N. (2021). Problematika Kualitas Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1), 1617–1620. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/1148
Hamermesh, D. S., & Parker, A. (2005). Beauty in the classroom: instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.013
Johnson, M. D., Narayanan, A., & Sawaya, W. J. (2013). Effects of Course and Instructor Characteristics on Student Evaluation of Teaching across a College of Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(2), 289–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20013
Kamayanti, A. (2013). Riset Akuntansi Kritis: Pendekatan (Non) Feminisme Tjoet Njak Dhien. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 4(3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2013.12.7203
Kemdikbud. (2020). Perguruan Tinggi Ladang SDM yang Profesional dan Inovatif. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/08/perguruan-tinggi-ladang-sdm-yang-profesional-dan-inovatif
Khan, A. W., & Subhan, Q. A. (2019). Impact of board diversity and audit on firm performance. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1611719
Kreitzer, R. J., & Sweet-Cushman, J. (2022). Evaluating Student Evaluations of Teaching: A Review of Measurement and Equity Bias in SETs and Recommendations for Ethical Reform. Journal of Academic Ethics, 20(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09400-w
Maryam, R. (2023). Tantangan Profesi Akuntan di Era Digital dan Cara Mengatasinya. Kompasiana.Com. https://www.kompasiana.com/radithamaryam8480/64950f7a10d8e0581147d702/tantangan-profesi-akuntan-di-era-digital-dan-cara-mengatasinya
McPherson, M. A., & Jewell, R. T. (2006). Does Gender Affect Evaluation Scores? An Analysis of Graduate Economics Classes. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.877944
Nehme, R., Kozah, A. E., Sadaka, S., & Michael, A. (2023). Accountants’ Behaviour, Performance Evaluation and Educational System. Australasian Business, Accounting and Finance Journal, 17(3), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v17i3.02
Okoye, K., Arrona-Palacios, A., Camacho-Zuñiga, C., Hammout, N., Nakamura, E. L., Escamilla, J., & Hosseini, S. (2020). Impact of students evaluation of teaching: a text analysis of the teachers' qualities by gender. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00224-z
Pratt, C. B. (1991). Public relations: The empirical research on practitioner ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(3), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383160
Rizqi, M. A., & Santoso, S. A. (2022). Peran Ganda Wanita Karir Dalam Manajemen Keluarga. Manajerial, 9(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.30587/jurnalmanajerial.v9i01.3483
Seiler, M. J., Seiler, V. L., & Chiang, D. (1999). Professor, Student, and Course Attributes that Contribute to Successful Teaching Evaluations. Financial Practice And Education, Fall/Winter, 91–99. https://www.fma.org/assets/docs/JAF/1999/fpe1999_9_2_11.pdf
Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M., & Griffiths, M. (2000). The Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching in Higher Education: Love me, love my lectures? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611436
Sitompul, D. N., Dongoran, F. R., & Hayati, I. (2021). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Akuntansi Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Student Facilitatory and Explaining. EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 9(2), 207–213. https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/edutech/article/view/7065
Soedradjat, S. B., & Suryaningrum, D. H. (2022). Efek Gender, Kesulitan Akuntansi, Peluang Karir dan Sindrom Impostor terhadap Keputusan Mahasiswa Memilih Jurusan Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 20(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v20i1.47519
Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598–642. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313496870
Steenkamp, N., & Roberts, R. (2020). Does workload and institutional pressure on accounting educators affect academia at Australian universities? Accounting & Finance, 60(1), 471–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12340
Stroebe, W. (2020). Student Evaluations of Teaching Encourages Poor Teaching and Contributes to Grade Inflation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 42(4), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2020.1756817
Suarjana, A. A. G. M., & Yintayani, N. N. (2017). Pengaruh Kompetensi Dosen terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa pada Jurusan Akuntansi Politeknik Negeri Bali. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 13(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.31940/jbk.v13i2.699
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (3rd ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sundem, G. L., & Williams, D. Z. (1992). Changes in accounting education: preparing for the twenty-first century ∗. Accounting Education, 1(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639289200000006
Suryanti, S., & Arfah, E. A. (2019). Pengaruh Profesionalisme Akuntan Pendidik, Kecerdasan Emosional dan Metode Pembelajaran Terhadap Pemahaman Akuntansi. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v2i1.187
Uttl, B., White, C. A., & Gonzalez, D. W. (2017). Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007
Wahyudi, L. E., Mulyana, A., Dhiaz, A., Ghandari, D., Dinata, Z. P., Fitoriq, M., & Hasyim, M. N. (2022). Mengukur kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia. Ma’arif Journal of Education, Madrasah Innovation and Aswaja Studies, 1(1), 18–22. https://jurnal.maarifnumalang.id/index.php/mjemias/article/view/3
Veronica, A., Ernawati, Rasdiana, Abas, M., Yusriani, Hadawiah, Hidayah, N., Sabtohadi, J., Marlina, H., Mulyani, W., & Zulkarnain. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Global Eksekutif Teknologi.
Weidman, J. C. (2020). Conceptualizing Student Socialization in Higher Education: An Intellectual Journey (pp. 11–28). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33350-8_2
Yang, X., & Gao, C. (2021). Missing Women in STEM in China: An Empirical Study from the Viewpoint of Achievement Motivation and Gender Socialization. Research in Science Education, 51(6), 1705–1723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9833-0
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##
