Keahlian Komputer dan Kendali Lokus Mahasiswa dalam Penerimaan Teknologi Informasi

(Computer Skills and Student Locus of Control in Information Technology Acceptance)

  • Rusli Rusli Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya
  • Zawawi Zawawi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
Keywords: computer skill, information technology acceptance, LOC

Abstract

This research, conducted as a quantitative study, aims to establish the influence of locus of control (LOC) and computer skills on the acceptance of information technology. The primary data for this study was collected through the distribution of questionnaires among students at Universities A and B in Surabaya. The respondents were students enrolled in Computer Applications and Accounting Information Systems courses. Seventy-eight questionnaires were processed, and the data was analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. The test findings indicate that LOC does not significantly influence the acceptance of information technology, while computer skills do. These results highlight the necessity of incorporating computer and information technology-related material in the curriculum, particularly in the current digital era.

 

ABSTRAK: Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk membuktikan pengaruh locus of control (LOC) dan keahlian computer terhadap penerimaan teknologi informasi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan data primer yang diperoleh melalui penyebaran kuesioner. Kuesioner disebarkan kepada mahasiswa di Universitas A dan B yang ada di Surabaya. Mahasiswa yang dijadikan responden adalah mahasiswa yang mengikuti mata kuliah Aplikasi Komputer dan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. Kuesioner yang dapat diolah sebanyak 78 kuesioner. Pengujian dilakukan dengan analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil pengujian membuktikan bahwa LOC tidak memengaruhi penerimaan teknologi informasi, sedangkan keahlian computer memengaruhi penerimaan teknologi informasi. Hasil ini mengimplikasikan bahwa pembelajaran dengan materi yang berhubungan dengan komputer dan teknologi informasi sangat diperlukan mahasiswa, khususnya dalam era digital saat ini.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abay, K. A., Blalock, G., & Berhane, G. (2017). Locus of control and technology adoption in developing country agriculture: Evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 143, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.09.012

Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266

Bozalek, V. G., McMillan, W., Marshall, D. E., November, M., Daniels, A., & Sylvester, T. (2014). Analysing the professional development of teaching and learning from a political ethics of care perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(5), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.880681

Compeau, D., Gravill, J., Haggerty, N., & Kelley, H. (2007). Computer Self-Efficacy: A Review. In Human-computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations (p. 37). Routledge - Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315703619-21/computer-self-efficacy-review-deborah-compeau-jane-gravill-nicole-haggerty-helen-kelley

Ekasari, W. F., & Supriyadi, S. (2018). Peran Moderasi Framing dan Gaya Kognitif terhadap Bias Efek Urutan Bukti dalam Keputusan Penganggaran. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 20(4), 511–527. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2016.v20.i4.63

Ferdinand, A. (2014). Metode Penelitian Manajemen. UNDIP Press: Semarang.

Gabriella, Y., & Suryaningrum, D. H. (2021). Determinant Factors that Influence Auditors’ Ethical Decision Making with Ethical Sensitivity as an Intervening Variable. Public Management and Accounting Review, 2(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.61656/pmar.v2i1.66

Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J. D., & Boyle, L. N. (2012). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0194-3

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gore, J. S., Griffin, D. P., & McNierney, D. (2016). Does Internal or External Locus of Control Have a Stronger Link to Mental and Physical Health? Psychological Studies, 61(3), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-016-0361-y

Hay, A. W. (2015). Gaya Hidup Digital Kristiani Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Youth Ministry, 3(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.47901/jym.v3i1.429

He, J., & Freeman, L. A. (2010). Understanding the Formation of General Computer Self-Efficacy. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26(Article 12), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02612

Hermanto, S. B., & Patmawati, P. (2017). Determinan Penggunaan Aktual Perangkat Lunak Akuntansi Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 19(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.19.2.67-81

Hidayat, T. (2016). Pengaruh Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran, Struktur Desentralisasi dan Locus of Control terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Akuntabilitas, 8(2), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v8i2.2769

Hsia, J.-W. (2016). The effects of locus of control on university students’ mobile learning adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9103-8

Indriantoro, N. (2000). An Empirical Study of Locus of Control and Cultural Dimensions as Moderating Variables of the Effect of Participative Budgeting on Job Performance and Job Satisfaction. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, 15(1), 97–144. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/v3/jieb/issue/archive#paginate-2

Lefcourt, H. M. (1992). Durability and impact of the locus of control construct. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 411–414. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.411

Lubis, N. S., & Nasution, M. I. P. (2023). Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Dampaknya pada Masyarakat. Kohesi: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, 1(12), 41–50. https://ejournal.warunayama.org/index.php/kohesi/article/view/41

Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

Momani, A. M., Jamous, M. M., & Hilles, S. M. S. (2017). Technology Acceptance Theories. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCBPL.2017040101

Nudin, F., Rufi’i, R., & Walujo, D. (2021). Pengaruh E-Learning, Pembelajaran Langsung, dan Faktor Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Prakarya Kewirausahaan. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v6i12021p222

Pan, X. (2020). Technology Acceptance, Technological Self-Efficacy, and Attitude Toward Technology-Based Self-Directed Learning: Learning Motivation as a Mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294

Park, I., Kim, D., Moon, J., Kim, S., Kang, Y., & Bae, S. (2022). Searching for New Technology Acceptance Model under Social Context: Analyzing the Determinants of Acceptance of Intelligent Information Technology in Digital Transformation and Implications for the Requisites of Digital Sustainability. Sustainability, 14(1), 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010579

Putri, P. H., Praptiningsih, P., & Maulana, A. (2021). Analisis Penggunaan Zahir Accounting dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model. Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4(2), 178–205. https://doi.org/10.21632/saki.4.2.178-205

Renn, R. W., & Vandenberg, R. J. (1991). Differences in Employee Attitudes and Behaviors Based on Rotter’s (1966) Internal-External Locus of Control: Are They All Valid? Human Relations, 44(11), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679104401102

Srisupawong, Y., Koul, R., Neanchaleay, J., Murphy, E., & Francois, E. J. (2018). The relationship between sources of self-efficacy in classroom environments and the strength of computer self-efficacy beliefs. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9630-1

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (3rd ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryaningrum, D. H., Hastuti, S., & Suhartini, D. (2013). Accounting Students and Lecturers Ethical Behavior: Evidence from Indonesia. In Business Education & Accreditation (Vol. 5, Issue 1). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2155085

Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/249443

Utari, G. A. K. D., Datrini, L. K., & Ekayani, N. N. S. (2020). Pengaruh Modernisasi Sistem Administrasi Perpajakan dan Kesadaran Wajib Pajak pada Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak (KPP) Pratama Tabanan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Warmadewa, 1(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.22225/jraw.1.1.1542.34-38

Published
2023-05-31
How to Cite
Rusli, R., & Zawawi, Z. (2023). Keahlian Komputer dan Kendali Lokus Mahasiswa dalam Penerimaan Teknologi Informasi: (Computer Skills and Student Locus of Control in Information Technology Acceptance). Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Policy and Technology, 1(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.61656/ijospat.v1i1.154