What Really Drives Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure? Role of Firm Size, Profitability, Board Size, and Ownership Structure

Authors

  • Verawati Damayanti Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
  • Dominikus Kopong Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Maximus Leonardo Universitas Timor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61656/sbamr.v8i1.130

Keywords:

firm size, profitability, board of commissioners, ownership structure, corporate social responsibility disclosure

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine and analyze the effect of firm size, profitability, board of commissioners’ size, public ownership, and foreign ownership on the extent of corporate social responsibility disclosure among manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.

Method: This study applies a quantitative explanatory approach. The population consists of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2020 to 2022 period. Using a purposive sampling technique, 67 companies were selected, producing 201 firm year observations. Secondary data were obtained from annual reports published on the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange, and the data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with the assistance of SPSS version 25.

Findings: The results show that firm size has a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure, while profitability, board of commissioners’ size, public ownership, and foreign ownership do not significantly affect the extent of disclosure when tested individually. Simultaneously, all five variables significantly influence corporate social responsibility disclosure and jointly explain 38.9 percent of its variation.

Implications: For regulators and standard setters, the dominant role of firm size suggests that disclosure monitoring and support mechanisms should be calibrated according to company scale, while the limited role of governance and ownership variables indicates that structural regulation alone may not be sufficient to induce broader social responsibility reporting. For managers, the results imply that larger firms carry a heavier legitimacy burden and should treat disclosure as an integral part of stakeholder management rather than a compliance formality.

Originality: Unlike prior studies that generally examine a single determinant or a narrow set of governance variables in isolation, this study integrates firm characteristics, board governance, and two distinct ownership dimensions, namely public and foreign ownership, within one coherent explanatory model applied to a three year panel of Indonesian manufacturing firms, offering a more holistic account of why disclosure extent varies among firms operating under the same regulatory environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhter, F., Hossain, M. R., Elrehail, H., Rehman, S. U., & Almansour, B. (2022). Environmental disclosures and corporate attributes, from the lens of legitimacy theory: A longitudinal analysis on a developing country. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 32(3), 342-369. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-01-2021-0008

Alam, Z., & Tariq, Y. B. (2022). Corporate social responsibility disclosure quality and firm financial performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Global Business Review, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221131729

Ali, W., Frynas, J. G., & Mahmood, Z. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1410

Awa, H. O., Etim, W., & Ogbonda, E. (2024). Stakeholders, stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility (CSR). International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 9, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00094-y

Ben Fatma, H., & Chouaibi, J. (2021). Corporate governance and CSR disclosure: Evidence from European financial institutions. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(4), 346-361. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-021-00117-1

Das, S. K., Miah, M., Miah, M. R., Akter, D., & Hossain, T. (2021). Sustainability reporting disclosure practices among Bangladeshi companies in line with Global Reporting Initiatives. Asian Journal of Accounting Perspectives, 14(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.22452/AJAP.vol14no1.4

Fathihani, Santoso, N., Sulistiyowati, R., & Veronica, M. (2025). ESG disclosure and financial performance: The moderating role of firm size in Indonesian banking sector. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 10(3), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v10i3.960

Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675 (Original work published 1984)

Fuadah, L. L., Mukhtaruddin, M., Andriana, I., & Arisman, A. (2022). The ownership structure, and the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure, firm value, and firm performance: The audit committee as moderating variable. Economies, 10(12), Article 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10120314

Gupta, S., Vaishali, & Kumar, R. (2025). Which ownership structure will sustain sustainability? An empirical examination of ESG disclosure. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 22(3), 759-775. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-024-00266-z

Handayati, P., Sumarsono, H., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and Indonesian firm value: The moderating effect of profitability and firms’ size. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 9(4), 703-714. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v9i4.940

Hussain, N., Khan, S. A., Nguyen, D. K., Stocchetti, A., & Corbet, S. (2025). Board-level governance and corporate social responsibility: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 39(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12603

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kristiawan, N. B. (2024). The relationship between ownership concentration, firm size, and corporate social responsibility disclosure in Indonesian manufacturing companies. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 3(5), 247-252. https://doi.org/10.56472/25835238/IRJEMS-V3I5P130

Li, J., & Sasaki, M. (2024). The impact of state ownership on corporate social responsibility reporting: A comparison between state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises in China. Management Communication Quarterly, 38(3), 504-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189231209727

Lui, T. K., & Zainuldin, M. H. (2022). Do foreign banks disclose corporate social responsibility practices more than their local counterparts? Empirical evidence of an emerging market context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1855-1870. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2332

Mai, M. U., Sudradjat, & Sembiring, E. E. (2023). Board characteristics, state ownership, and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Indonesian Islamic banks. Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(2), Article 2266323. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2266323

Meiryani, Huang, S. M., Soepriyanto, G., Jessica, Fahlevi, M., Grabowska, S., & Aljuaid, M. (2023). The effect of voluntary disclosure on financial performance: Empirical study on manufacturing industry in Indonesia. PLOS ONE, 18(6), Article e0285720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285720

Nguyen, V. H. (2025). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and firm value: A signaling theory perspective. Journal of Economics and Development, 27(2), 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-02-2024-0067

Nugraheni, P., Indrasari, A., & Hamzah, N. (2022). The impact of ownership structure on CSR disclosure: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 23(2), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v23i2.14633

Qaderi, S. A., Alhmoud, T. R., & Ghaleb, B. A. A. (2020). Audit committee features and CSR disclosure: Additional evidence from an emerging market. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(5), 226-239. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n5p226

Reschiwati, R., Idayanti, I., & Sayekti, F. (2026). Exploring the moderating role of firm size on corporate governance and CSR disclosure in Indonesian listed companies. Greenation International Journal of Economics and Accounting, 4(3), 530-543. https://doi.org/10.38035/gijea.v4i3.941

Risal, Giriati, Wendy, & Malini, H. (2023). Firm size, profitability, and ESG disclosure in Indonesia: Geographical location as moderating variable. International Journal of Economics Development Research, 4(5), 2333-2348. https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v5i2.5002

Sahasranamam, S., Arya, B., & Sud, M. (2020). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(4), 1165-1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09649-1

Seow, R. Y. C. (2024). Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure: A systematic literature review. Journal of Economics and Sustainability, 6(2), 37-67. https://doi.org/10.32890/jes2024.6.2.3

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

Xu, R., Liu, J., & Yang, D. (2023). The formation of reputation in CSR disclosure: The role of signal transmission and sensemaking processes of stakeholders. Sustainability, 15(12), Article 9418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129418

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Damayanti, V., Kopong, D., & Leonardo, M. (2026). What Really Drives Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure? Role of Firm Size, Profitability, Board Size, and Ownership Structure. Sustainable Business Accounting and Management Review, 8(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.61656/sbamr.v8i1.130

Similar Articles

1-10 of 28

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.